Jewish Temperament

Understanding temperament through the prism of Chassidus and Kabbalah

Category: Center-Idealist

Personalities: Yaakov

by Zalman

The forefathers are referred to as a merkavah, a chariot for G-d, meaning that every step they took was in complete accordance with G-d’s will. This was possible because their entire self was wholly dedicated to G-d. This, however, didn’t detract from their particular personalities, and it is for this reason that each of the forefathers represent a different spectrum of G-d’s attributes, directly corresponding to their own temperament.

What’s more, the Gemara states that all Jewish people possess three qualities: humility, empathy, and generosity. These qualities are inherited from the forefathers, with each one contributing a different quality. It turns out that each of the forefathers specifically contributed the quality that most represented their own temperament.

Yaakov is famously cited in Chassidus as representing the center path — meaning the unifying path — of the sefirot, which include da’astiferes, and yesod. Yaakov is referred to as “the attribute of truth”, which is understood to mean the center path, that which unifies the right and left. In this way, Yaakov was an Idealist, embodying such traits as diplomatic intelligence, authenticity, mystical, romantic, and peace-seeking. Let’s take a look:

Diplomatic intelligence: There are many instances in the Torah where Yaakov displays his innate understanding of people, and his skill of influencing them for good. Here are a few examples:
In conversation with Eisav, Yaakov addressed his brother with utmost respect, consistently appealing to Eisav’s desire for power by referring to him as “my master”. And later, Yaakov tactfully declined unwanted offers of companionship from Eisav, knowing as he did how quickly their fragile relationship could sour.
When his son Yosef announced his ambitious dreams before Yaakov and his sons, Yaakov diplomatically pointed to the falsehood the dream contained in the hopes that this would ameliorate his sons’ animosity towards Yosef. He did this even though he himself believed the dreams to be true, and anticipated their fulfillment.
Yaakov teaches us proper etiquette when addressing a king, blessing Pharaoh at the beginning and end of his audience with him.
In connection to requesting of Yosef to fulfill his last wish, Yaakov makes sure to resolve a potential sore point for Yosef — the seeming ordinary burial of his mother Rochel.
Yaakov was very in-tune with the personality, needs, and desires of each of his sons, so that he was able to bless each one personally and intimately. At that time, Yaakov made sure to give Yosef his due, bowing to him as the viceroy of Egypt, despite also being his own son.

Authenticity: When Yaakov’s mother instructed him to trick his father, Yaakov registered his protest to such a plan, specifically being concerned that his father will discover his plot and consider him a liar. Even when carrying out the plan, Yaakov goes out of his way not to actually lie, instead skirting the truth to allow his father to draw his own conclusions.
Before the epic confrontation with his brother Eisav, Yaakov requested G-d’s protection, although it had already been promised to him. Yaakov considered himself unworthy of G-d’s protection, thinking it may have already been used up by all the favors G-d had already done for him.
In Yaakov’s battle with Eisav’s angel, he demanded the angel recognize his claim to the firstborn rights and the blessings of Yitzchak. The angel informed Yaakov that he would at a later date affirm Yaakov’s claims, when G-d would change his name — indeed, his identity — to Yisroel (“the Nobleman of G-d”). But this wasn’t enough for Yaakov. He forced the angel to acknowledge his title then and there.
Later in life, Yaakov consistently blamed himself for events that transpired to him. One of his greatest fears was to fail in his life-mission to build the Jewish nation out of his twelve sons. If one were to die beyond Yaakov’s control, he would still consider it a personal failure, to the extent that he would expect to suffer in “שאול” for it.

Mystical: Angels were a big part of Yaakov’s life: he had multiple dreams about angels, with some ascending and descending his famed ladder, and others helping in his financial disputes with Lavan. He is said to have been accompanied by angels on his way to Charan, and met by more on his way back. Yaakov even wrestled with an angel while he was preparing to meet his brother Eisav.
Two major events in Yaakov’s life developed as a result of his intuition, or רוח הקודש: He sent his son Yosef to check on his brothers, though he knew it meant risking his life, because Yaakov “saw” that it would affect great positive change. And later, Yaakov sent his sons to Egypt, having “seen” that there was hope there.

Romantic: The first time Yaakov gazed upon his cousin and future wife, Rochel, he was so star-struck that he rolled a huge boulder off a well single-handedly — a feat usually accomplished by many men. He kissed her even before introducing himself, and he said that the seven years he had to wait before marrying her felt like a few days.
When Yaakov decided to leave his father-in-law’s house, he made a point to ask his wives if they were okay with leaving.
Yaakov famously mourned for his lost son unconsolably for twenty-two consecutive years. In fact, Yaakov is recorded as having cried at least four times in the Torah, and every one of them was in connection to a relationship.

Peace-seeking: Yaakov avoided confrontation, and sought reconciliation all his life. First, he ran from his brother Eisav, but later made peace with him in a grand brotherly spectacle. He also requested leave of his father-in-law multiple times, but couldn’t bring himself to actually go without his blessing. When Yaakov finally got the message from G-d that it was time to leave, he didn’t request it or demand it of Lavan. He didn’t even inform him. He snuck out in middle of the night. All, to avoid the confrontation. Later, when Lavan caught up with Yaakov, they ended up coming to terms.
When his daughter Dinah was abducted and violated, the high-ranking offender had the audacity to request her hand in marriage. Yaakov didn’t respond at all, instead leaving the matter to his more confrontational sons.
Towards the end of his life, Yaakov settled down with but one request: he wanted to spend the rest of his days in tranquility. He first had to go through twenty-two years of hell, but in the end, he got what he asked for.

In the end, it is fitting that Yaakov, who takes the role of Idealist — the unifying type — bequeathed the quality of empathy to all his descendants for all generations.

Temperaments: Idealist

by Zalman

According to Chassidus, each of the four temperaments can be described entirely with a single overarching term, which for the Idealist is unification. As such, when we dig deeper into the Idealist’s personality, we discover that this specific term describes its every aspect. The many aspects of personality are divided in Chassidus into three primary categories; those being intellect, personal disposition (i.e., with regard to oneself), and relational disposition (i.e., in the context of others). So, in short, if we were to categorize the Idealist, we would find that his intellect, personal disposition, and relational disposition are all unifying.

The Idealist’s intellect is Daas — unifying intellect. In the process of resolving an idea, Daas represents the stage when we relate to the idea, when it becomes relevant. In this context, Daas is the unification of ideas with emotions, intuiting what an idea means to me. On a more general level, Daas represents the intuitive understanding of emotion and human psyche, which Keirsey calls diplomatic intellect. Owed to this trait, the Idealist takes interest in studying and affecting people, through counseling, teaching, guiding, and mentoring. On a personal level, Daas drives the Idealist in his life-long struggle to understand, and be true to, himself. It is because of Daas that Idealists wear their emotions on their sleeve, expressing themselves with delightful enthusiasm.

The Idealist’s personal emotion is Tiferes — unifying personal disposition. With Tiferes, we may recognize worthiness and lack thereof, yet we can overlook it, to extend our sympathy and care to others. Idealists, therefore, are described as benevolent; being kind, caring, merciful, and sympathetic to others. The Idealist sees potential good in everyone, no matter whom, and will readily give of themselves to help others grow. In fact, the Idealist despises selfishness and wouldn’t be able to live with themselves if they are not living for others.

The Idealist’s relational emotion is Yesod — unifying relational disposition. Yesod, being relational, brings Tiferes to another level. Yesod is empathy; the ability to identify with others on an emotional level. It’s the ability to have a personal relationship with another person, recognizing oneself and the other within a relationship. The Idealist is therefore an incurable romantic, always yearning for that deep, personal connection. Because of Yesod, the Idealist will go to great lengths to effect peace; in their own relationships, in others’ relationships, and indeed, in the world over.

* * *

The Idealist in Judaism

Hero: Yaakov Avinu

Symbol on the Merkavah: Man

Davening Meditation: Just like the Idealist’s nature is unification, so too his meditation is of G-d’s unity. On the one hand, G-d sustains the world through His vital energy, but on the other hand, from the perspective of G-d’s spirituality, the world is worthless. Through this meditation, we recognize that both tell the same story: the physical world should not be seen as an interference with the spiritual, rather the actualization of its purpose. The world has no value other than the fulfillment of G-d’s desire, but at that level, the world gains the most value. Therefore, the only way to realize the true potential of the physical is to fuse it with the spiritual. In this way, both the perspective that the world is nothing compared to G-d, as well as G-d’s energy which sustains the world, work toward the same purpose: to actualize the purpose of creation.

Divine Purpose: The Idealist’s greatest gift is the ability to unify. To unify above and below, physical with spiritual, and a man with his fellow. The Idealist becomes unified to G-d through immersing himself in Torah, both through learning it, and through keeping it. The Idealist finds mystical meaning all around him, especially in fulfilling mitzvot, through which we become more refined and better people while connecting to G-d’s will. At the same time, it pains the Idealist to know of others’ disputes, and he can use his unifying ability to bring them together. The Idealist understands the power that Torah has to unite, and uses the lessons and messages found in Torah to do just that.

Learning Torah through drush: what this piece of information teaches us about humanity. Idealists take a natural liking to the inspiring parts of Torah, including aggadah, navi, history, midrash, and especially the personal-growth (“avodah“) parts of Chassidus. However, as the material gets more technical, the Idealist may become less interested (though they may continue studying because they should). Therefore, when learning dry Halacha, the Idealist tries to find inner meanings and “richness” to the various opinions and arguments they encounter. Similarly, being abstract, Idealists can find much enjoyment in Gemara and its method, with its vast treasure of ideas, perspectives and thought processes. Still, when learning anything, the Idealist invariably tries to find the personal relevance or the hidden mystical meanings in the subject material.

Vocation: Idealists will generally take up positions that help others grow: teachers, counselors, rabbis, mentors; for which there are plenty positions within Judaism. Generally, the most beloved teachers and rabbis are Idealists, due to their ability to connect to others. Many Idealists also become artists, whether in visual art, literature, or music; with a focus on inspiring others through their more spiritual form of art.

Jewish Temperament Theory

by Zalman

Over the past century, as the fields of the behavioral sciences exploded in breadth and reach, there has been a relatively quiet revolution growing parallel. The underlying premise behind this revolution is that there are a specific number of personality types, and every person is born to be a single type. Once we understand which type a given person is, most, if not all, of his behaviors, attitudes, and even thinking methods, can be explained by his temperament, and at times even anticipated.

This is the study of human temperament.

Loosely speaking, this revolution was widely popularized by Isabel Briggs-Myers’ Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Once it was published, people the world over were clamoring to find out “who they were”. More recently, Myers’ work was brought to a completely new level, in structure and application, by a preeminent psychologist, David Keirsey. In his book, Please Understand Me II, Keirsey not only polished the theory and made it more understandable and accessible, he also made it more scientific. While Myers had 16 types, Keirsey divided them into 4 basic types. While Myers based her Indicator on the theoretical work of Carl Jung, Keirsey based his work on 60+ years of observing people. While Myers tried to deduce thought and emotion, Keirsey established observable phenomena. And, most importantly, while Myers’ types fluctuate in their applicability, Keirsey’s remain consistent throughout the spectrum.

After studying the work of Dr. Keirsey, it becomes eminently apparent that the ideas he lays forth are to be found within the depth of Chassidic wisdom. Here, we will attempt to uncover many of the relationships between sage Chassidic teachings and modern-day personology.

It starts with the four temperaments: Artisan, Guardian, Idealist, and Rational. Each of these types are extremely different in every aspect of personality, from intellect to language; from interests to orientation; from self-image to values. We will explore the four types in depth, but for now, let’s suffice with a short list of descriptive words for each.
The Artisan is described by Keirsey as being tactical, optimistic, artistic, audacious, excited, impulsive, and generous.
The Guardian is considered logistical, dependable, beneficent, respectable, concerned, authoritative, and grateful.
The Idealist is diplomatic, mystical, empathic, benevolent, authentic, enthusiastic, intuitive, and romantic.
Finally, the Rational is strategic, pragmatic, relativistic, ingenious, autonomous, purposeful, resolute, calm, and abstract.

Chassidic doctrine is punctuated by Kabbalah’s famous 10 Sefirot, from Chochmah to Malchus. However, if we were to compact the sefirot into what are called kavim, or paths, we would discover that there are but four general categories:
The right path, expansion, represented by Chochmah, Chessed, and Netzach.
The left path, contraction, represented by Binah, Gevurah, and Hod.
The center path, unification, represented by the Da’as, Tiferes, and Yesod.
Malchus, abstraction, also in the center, without its own distinct qualities to speak of.

When viewing the Sefirot in this light, the correlations become obvious (compare the following terms with those describing the temperaments above):
The Artisan expands, like the right path of the spectrum, which include Chochmah (expansive intellect), Chessed (expansive personal disposition), and Netzach (expansive relational disposition). Some terms to describe these sefirot would be: creative, generous, optimistic, competitive, and audacious.
The Guardian contracts, representing the left path of the Sefirot, which include Binah (contractive intellect), Gevurah (contractive personal disposition), and Hod (contractive relational disposition). Words that describe these sefirot might include: logistical, respectable, concerned, beneficent, and grateful.
The Idealist, representing the center path, unifies with Da’as (unifying intellect), Tiferes (unifying personal disposition), Yesod (unifying relational disposition). These sefirot may be described with words like: intuitive, mystical, kind, empathic, and romantic.
The Rational represents Malchus, which is not as much a path as it is a single abstract point. Malchus also represents expression, primarily through speech, and can be described with words such as: abstract, purposeful, and relativistic.

It can be seen, then, that with Chassidus, we have a wealth of relevant information on personology that we may not have seen before. Everything described here is yet brief. And as we explore these themes even more in depth, we find more and more correlations between Chassidic teachings and the modern understanding of temperament. Not only that, but Chassidus also adds a level of purpose and meaning to an otherwise dry, if accurate, study of personality. With Chassidus we understand the purpose of knowing ourselves, and the consequent self-improvement journey we should embark on once we find out.